Back to Studies

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in the Management of Sports Medicine Injuries

Schroeder, Allison N., Tenforde, Adam S., Jelsing, Elena J. Current Sports Medicine Reports 2021 Not specified

Summary

This comprehensive review evaluates the clinical use of ESWT for musculoskeletal conditions in athletes, finding it generally safe and effective for various conditions while noting that optimal protocols are not yet standardized for most indications.

Key Findings

"ESWT has been shown to be relatively safe. The main adverse effects occur at the site of application and include pain (primarily during application), skin irritation (transient reddening, bruising, swelling), or nerve irritation (transient paresthesias)."
"ESWT is a safe treatment option for peripheral musculoskeletal conditions in athletes. Treatment with ESWT requires no, to minimal, time away from sport."
"ESWT can be combined with other treatment modalities and should be used as a supplement to, rather than a substitute for, physical therapy, with the goal of achieving longer-term benefits."

Treatment Categories

Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

moderate effectiveness

Mixed evidence on effectiveness. May be more effective for calcific tendinopathy with translucent calcifications.

Specific Findings

ESWT was 0.78 points better on VAS pain scale compared to placebo at 3 months

Cochrane review of 32 randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials

Patient Type

Mixed

Shockwave Type

Not specified

Outcomes
Pain Reduction: moderate
Compared To: Placebo
Limitations

Did not meet minimal clinically important difference of 1.5 points

Lateral Elbow Epicondylopathy

moderate effectiveness

FDA-approved indication with mixed evidence but generally positive results.

Specific Findings

Statistically significant improvement in short-term pain (1, 3, and 6 months) and grip strength (3 months)

Not specified

Patient Type

Non-athletic population (extrapolated to athletes)

Shockwave Type

Not specified

Outcomes
Pain Reduction: significant
Functional Improvement: significant for grip strength
Compared To: Not specified
Limitations

No difference in function (1 to 3 months)

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome

high effectiveness

Both radial and focused ESWT appear effective.

Specific Findings

76% of athletes returned to sport within 1 week to 3 months

Study by Furia et al.

Patient Type

Athletes

Shockwave Type

radial

Protocol
sessions: One session
impulses: 2000 impulses
pressure: four bars
Outcomes
Return to Activity: 76% within 1 week to 3 months
Compared To: Not specified

Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy

high effectiveness

Strong evidence for effectiveness in athletes.

Specific Findings

80% of athletes treated with ESWT returned to preinjury level of sports participation by 3 months vs 0% in conservative treatment

Randomized controlled trial by Cacchio et al.

Patient Type

Professional athletes

Shockwave Type

radial

Protocol
sessions: Four weekly sessions
energyFluxDensity: 0.18 mJ·mm²
impulses: 2500 impulses
Outcomes
Return to Activity: 80% by 3 months
Compared To: Conservative treatment (0% return)

Patellar Tendinopathy

high effectiveness

Effective nonoperative treatment with evidence of in-season benefits.

Specific Findings

ESWT may be a superior alternative to other nonoperative treatments and equal to tomy surgery

Meta-analysis of 7 studies

Patient Type

Athletes (including in-season volleyball, basketball, handball)

Shockwave Type

Not specified

Outcomes
Functional Improvement: high
Return to Activity: Positive for in-season athletes
Compared To: Other nonoperative treatments, patellar tenotomy surgery
Limitations

Various protocols used

Achilles Tendinopathy

high effectiveness

Effective especially when combined with eccentric exercises.

Specific Findings

Eccentric exercises with ESWT resulted in the largest improvement in pain and function

Network meta-analysis

Patient Type

Mixed (athletes and non-athletes)

Shockwave Type

Both radial and focused studied

Outcomes
Pain Reduction: high
Functional Improvement: high
Compared To: Other treatments

Plantar Fasciopathy

high effectiveness

FDA-approved indication with strong evidence of effectiveness.

Specific Findings

Higher intensity ESWT (EFD >0.2 mJ·mm²) more effective than corticosteroid injections

Meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials

Patient Type

Not specified

Shockwave Type

Higher intensity

Protocol
energyFluxDensity: >0.2 mJ·mm²
Outcomes
Pain Reduction: high
Functional Improvement: high
Compared To: Corticosteroid injections
Limitations

Similar recurrence rate among all groups at 1 year

Other Tendinopathies

moderate effectiveness

Promising results for distal biceps and tibialis posterior tendinopathy.

Specific Findings

Promising results for distal biceps and tibialis posterior tendinopathy

Not specified

Patient Type

Recreational athletes and laborers

Shockwave Type

Not specified

Outcomes
Compared To: Not specified

Study Limitations

  • No single optimal ESWT protocol has been identified.
  • ESWT appears to have the most efficacy in the short term.
  • Many studies did not report the athletic activity of the population at baseline, so the results of these studies are extrapolated to an athletic population.
Care Credit Financing Available

No interest payments available